A Christian?

Theology has to account for this

Earlier today, someone asked me what I thought it meant to be a Christian. Oddly enough, I’ve never been asked that before — at least, not quite so bluntly. I have views about how theology must fit the reality of our animal existence, and I will set them down in print when I have worked through some of the issues they raise. But for now, from a practical point of view, here’s what I think ‘being a Christian’ involves.

Do justly, love mercy, walk humbly.

Love your neighbour as yourself. This doesn’t mean letting my neighbour walk all over me. It doesn’t mean that I should approve of my neighbour evading responsibility for his or her own action or inaction any more than I should evade responsibility for mine. It means expecting of myself no less than I expect of others. It means expecting of others no more than I expect of myself. It also means:

  • Don’t do to others what I wouldn’t like them to do to me.
  • Condemn not that I be not condemned.
  • Examine the plank in my own eye before I even begin to comment on the speck in someone else’s.

And:

  • Don’t compete for the best places at parties.
  • Pray in secret not for show. Indeed, don’t do anything for show.
  • Openness — let your light so shine  …  as a city on a hill, a lamp on a stand.
  •  Watch for the signs of the times. Use your nous. To stand in front of an oncoming car expecting it not to hit me is stupid. Newton’s first law of motion still holds (he thought his most important role in life was as a Biblical Scholar).
  • Let your ‘yes’ be yes and your ‘no’ be no — anything else is evil. (What about diplomacy?)
  • Do not treat people with partiality, for God is no respecter of persons … you have one Father and you are all sisters and brothers. Everyone. Not just members of your family, your tribe, your race, your denomination, your opinion. Everyone. Including those who hate you.
  • Love one another as I have loved you. Thankfully, loving does not have to mean liking.

I fall short on them all. I’m human therefore I make mistakes. The psychological authenticity of Jesus’ message sustains mesometimes only justin my priestly role. I suppose what this role boils down to is: encouraging people to confront reality by living in the present (e-ternity, ec-stasis), free from the burden of the past (forgiveness), feet planted on the ground (humility), eyes and mind looking all round and beyond (others and otherness). Some of the doctrine we’ve inherited was written by and for a pre-mediaeval view of the universe. Some of it reflects the pyschological obsession of the writer. Some of it has passed its sell-by date. Much of it is poetic imagery. Nearly all of it expresses deep psychological truths.

The questioner asked me a second question: do I believe every word when I say the Creed. What a question. Watch this space.

3 thoughts on “A Christian?

  1. Simon

    Two reflections on your thoughts:
    1. Although we talk about the 2 Great Commandments, we always take the position of the man in Matt. 22:36 who asked Jesus which was the greatest. Jesus replied with the Shema (Deut 6:5) and with the anti-vengeance command (Lev. 19:18). And we hear Jesus’ reply when we ask the same question. That puts us in the place of the Jewish enquirer. But we’ve failed to notice that in preparing for his death Jesus gave a new commandment (John 13:34) paraphrased “insofar as you love one another, [do so not as yourselves any more,] love as I have loved you”. To my mind it supersedes the OT prescription. When we hear that reply, this puts us in the place of the ‘Christ-ish’ [Christ-like] enquirer. Of course, this encapsulates all we’ve learned from Jesus’ teaching on Lev (you’ve listed them) but it adds so much more. We can’t even obey Lev 19:18. How can we obey Jn 13:34! Only when we give up our self entirely can we love God with our totality. Then Jesus does the loving with us: “Christ in you” (Col. 1:27).
    2. I was taught the creed at Theological College by a wonderful Egyptian Christian. He likened it to a football pitch. The creed outlines corrections to the four great heresies. If we play inside these boundaries—the pitch—we’re okay. If the ball goes over the line—’game over’. The creed doesn’t define what’s within the boundary, only what the boundary looks like. Believe what you like as long as you’re playing ball; don’t cross a boundary.
    Every blessing

    Reply
  2. mickfuters

    As ever good food for thought with an emphasis on orthopraxis.
    On the Creed I’ve always liked the notion that it’s more believable when it’s sung rather than said.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s